August 9, 2022

The NFT market is flourishing, really. As soon as once more, the Wall Avenue Journal makes a idiot of itself by tackling topics past the publication’s comprehension. The writer declares “the NFT market is collapsing,” citing suspicious numbers and two instances of unhealthy trades as proof. After which, to prime all of it off poses a horrible principle. The “NFT Gross sales Are Flatlining” article is embarrassing past perception.

Disclaimer: The next op-ed represents the views of the writer, and will not essentially replicate the views of Bitcoinist. Bitcoinist is an advocate of inventive and monetary freedom alike.

Amongst different issues, it proposes the worst definition of NFTs ever written: 

“NFTs are bitcoin-like digital tokens that act like a certificates of possession that dwell on a blockchain.”

No, NFTs will not be “bitcoin-like” in any respect. And the WSJ simply forgot in regards to the “non-fungible” side of those distinctive digital property. And sure, somebody purchased an NFT of Jack Dorsey’s first tweet for $2.9M, one other particular person purchased a Snoop Dogg endorsed one for $32K. Each tried to public sale the digital property and solely received embarrassingly low gives. Primarily based on these two instances, the WSJ implies that the entire NFT market is useless on the water.

The WSJ bogus numbers in regards to the NFT Market

Admittedly, the Wall Avenue Journal in all probability has entry to a wider array of knowledge than NewsBTC. Nonetheless, the numbers they use to show the NFT market is useless are suspicious as hell. 

“The sale of nonfungible tokens, or NFTs, fell to a each day common of about 19,000 this week, a 92% decline from a peak of about 225,000 in September, based on the info web site NonFungible.  

The variety of energetic wallets within the NFT market fell 88% to about 14,000 final week from a excessive of 119,000 in November.”

Discover that they don’t hyperlink to NonFungible and supply a couple of low-resolution graphs that the conventional eye can’t audit. Nonetheless, everybody can go to NonFungible. The variety of gross sales for Could third is 104.465 and that represents $206B. Hardly the indicators of a useless NFT market. Granted, the variety of gross sales for April third is roughly 14K, however on Could 1st the NFT market moved a whooping $778B in 117K gross sales.

That’s not it. The WSJ additionally presents these stats as in the event that they show its case:

“The imbalance between provide and demand can be hurting the NFT market. There are about 5 NFTs for each purchaser, based on information from analytics agency Chainalysis. As of the top of April, there have been 9.2 million NFTs offered, which had been purchased by 1.8 million folks.”

Have they even been to OpenSea? There are a whole bunch of collections. And NFT aficionados personal dozens of items. Typically, a whole bunch. Typically, hundreds. And that’s only one platform that serves one blockchain. 5 NFTs for each purchaser is nothing.

See also  NFT Costs Take A Beating After Crypto Market Chaos

ETH worth chart for 05/04/2022 on Coinbase | Supply: ETH/USD on

The Wall Avenue Journal’s Off The Mark Concept

This is perhaps essentially the most ridiculous a part of the article. Let’s let the writer bury himself:

“There are indicators that collectors may differentiate between NFTs that catalog an enormous set of cartoonlike characters—just like the CryptoPunks—and tailor-made, NFT artwork initiatives spurred by main artists who already get pleasure from museum followings.”

 After which he talks about Jeff Koons and Chinese language artist Cai Guo Qiang, who offered out NFT collections, and director Kevin Smith, who’s planning to. In the meantime, Moonbirds set the NFT market on fireplace and the Bored Ape’s Otherside actually broke Ethereum. We’re speaking billions of {dollars} for the “cartoonlike characters” staff. Not solely that, The Nightly Mint factors us in the direction of Nansen’s numbers. 

They clearly present that “the final two weeks are each set to be among the many top-10 in historical past (measured in ETH).” And that “the Blue Chips and Social sectors are on a tear, up 81% and 83% YTD.”

So, what sport is the Wall Avenue Journal enjoying? Is that this a case of poor analysis or proof of malicious intent? That’s so that you can resolve, expensive reader.

Featured Picture by Philip Robust on Unsplash  | Charts by TradingView